A non-profit public interest organization which counsels and represents groups and individual concerns with the preservation and improvement of community environmental conditions. It is possible for citizens to protect themselves and their communities from dangerous and burdensome environmental hazards through knowledge and effective -- affordable legal avenues. We believe that environmental justice should be available to all people regardless of race, gender or age. By utilizing our "commando" law techniques we
are able to effectively promote the interests of the environmental community.

You can contact us at lawproject@earthlink.net or call us at (212)334-5551.



Wind is the wild card in Goleta fire.
Because of the fire's proximity to populated areas, officials made the Gap fire, near Goleta, the state's top priority among the 335 wildfires burning across California. From: Los Angeles Times. 2008-07-05

Proposed Nevada water pipeline project imperils communities, lifestyles.
The two driest states in the nation are in a quiet standoff, fitfully negotiating or scuffing lines in the sand. From: Salt Lake Tribune. 2008-07-05

Environmentalists gird for battle with Bush over rule changes.
Environmentalists are bracing for a final battle with the Bush administration over its efforts to weaken clean water, air and toxic waste regulations before a new president moves into the White House. From: Gannett News Service. 2008-07-05

Exxon Valdez ruling worries environmental watchdogs.
Will the U.S. Supreme Court decision to slash the punitive damages award in the Exxon Valdez case embolden oil companies to take shortcuts that put the environment at risk? From: Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 2008-07-05

View more...

 
 

CURRENT PROJECTS AND CASES:

 

HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR ALLIANCE

Save Ridgewood Reservoir blog

A Wilderness, Lost in the City OP ED by William Thomson & Robert Kennedy Jr ==. NY Times

 

SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN MARINE TRANSFER STATION - opposing the building of a new waste transfer station on the contaminated site of former illegal incinerator - click here for information and documents on the project.

 

WORLD TRADE CENTER: Benzman v. Whitman-The appeal decision from Judge Batts decision has been issued by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals... Defendant's intial appeals brief. === APPEALS COURT DECISION
NYELJP PRESS RELEASE: Documents reveal EPA & City Knowledge of toxic danger in Lower Manhattan in October 2001. see also Supporting Document

 

ARTIFICIAL TURF . NYC Dept Of Health Review

May 2008 NYSDEC ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CRUMB RUBBER

 

PAST CASES:

 

Washington Square Park: DOCUMENTS: Emergency Coalition to Save Washington Square Park et al. v. The City of New York et al.,. New BID REQUEST is out. see DPR ModIfication Technical Memo Judge Madden's decision expected in late September.

Deutsche Bank: The Law Project mourns the loss of two valiant firefighters. The toxic danger posed by this building continues to threaten the people of New York. See previous research.

EPA Releases Risk Assesment: The EPA has released a risk assesment on organophosphate pesticides, some of which have been approved despite their toxicity. Public comment is needed! Click above to read the Federal Register entry.

Pesticide Spraying: A recent press release from the DOH vastly understates the toxicity and danger presented to residents from the use of sumithrin.

Pier 57: NY Environmental Law and Justice Project v. NYPD- The NYPD has moved to reargue after a favorable decision by the court ordering them to release documents...read the decision and more by clicking above.

We mourn the passing of Brad Will, activist extradoniare

The NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & JUSTICE PROJECT is affiliated with the NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMITTEE

 

Disclaimer:  New York Environmental Law & Justice Project provides the information at this website for general information purposes only. The Material on this site does not constitute legal advice. DO NOT act upon this information without first consulting an attorney in person. No Attorney-Client relationship is formed unless specifically agreed to in writing. Our review of any emails that you send us or a review of, and/or response to, a submitted Case Evaluation form, does not mean that we are representing you are or that we are your lawyers. A written, signed retainer agreement is a prerequisite for this law group to be representing you. Statements contained herein do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the ultimate result or outcome of your legal matter.

Fair Use Notice: This site may at times contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc., that relate to the environment and its medical impact in any genre.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html  Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

Powered by webipsa. NY Environmental Law and Justice Project, all rights reserved 2006.